Marantz PMD661 Portable SD Recorder

By · Friday, April 30th, 2010
Best Digital Voice Recorder

31pJ3LxtNmL. SL160  Marantz PMD661 Portable SD Recorder
Marantz PMD661 Portable SD Recorder

Marantz PMD661 Portable SD Recorder
Product Description
Based on the innovative design of our hugely popular PMD660, the rugged and robust Marantz PMD661 incorporates a wide range of technical advances and convenience features that help it excel in virtually any application. Big enough to accommodate dual XLR microphones and light enough for handheld use, the PMD661 offers exceptional recording quality in literally any location.
Marantz PMD661 Portable SD Recorder

Disclaimer: www.BestDigitalVoiceRecorder.net is a paid affiliate of Amazon.com and eBay.com


 Powered by Max Banner Ads 

Comments

I’ve used several “portable” and I’ll use that term loosely digital recorders which all share the same positive – no noise and high shock resistance while recording, along with huge record times on memory cards.

Update 9-12-2009 – I just returned from a cruise ship using the 661. I used a Canon hs-10 avchd camera for capturing the main stage video and the 661 to plug into the ship’s mixing board for audio. The ship’s audio engineer was excited to see the 661 and hapily pulled out an XLR patch cord set to give me the house mix line out, which was recorded in the same lossless format used by the camcorder audio making synchronization in adobe premiere pro a breeze. The final benefit was hearing the show audio as it left the mixing board to the amps instead of being picked up by the camera set on a tripod in the audience full of echo and laughter. The final production to blu-ray disc sounded like I was right on stage with the camera. The marantz ALC circuit performed better than expected and prevented digital clipping while maximizing dynamic range. End of edit.

Update 11-16-2009 – just a note the PMD661 has found a new use besides a great recorder. It features 2 stereo high quality monitor speakers and placed in record-pause mode makes a portable studio monitor for everything from 48V XLR phantom mics you forgot to switch the power to, to XLR line ins with ground loops, and even 3.5 mm stereo line ins from computers. The speakers mute automatically for internal mic usage to prevent feedback. Having this in the field to review or check audio connections has proven an added bonus when you can’t pack your favorite studio monitor speaker in your carry on case.

(end of updates review starts below)

When Marantz added a line level XLR input as opposed to just a mic level input in the 660 (prior model) I finally jumped at it. Since I work alot of mixing boards I have access to the final stereo mixdown at line level voltages. Whats the big deal? Recording at line level gives you 20dB more signal to noise – thats 100 times better for those of you who don’t speak dB – compared to mic level xlr inputs. If you look at your dvd player at home all the outputs are line level simply to get rid of noise. With such a fabulous recorder, why in the world would you want 100 times more noise in your recordings?

There are many other factors Marantz did that made the 661 the recorder to get – the display is bright and easy to read under all conditions, they used a 1/4″ headphone jack so your little 3.5mm headphones wouldn’t pull out at the worst moment (another pro move) – and they improved the case quality. There is also a digital input for people who are 100% digital already.

Given these features, the PMD-661 sits head and antlers above all the other compact recorders out there offering professional connectivity at an economical price. It’s also fully customizable – the bright display is dimmable through 8 steps for indoor club use at night, and it features dual rca line level outputs for analog playback. About the only thing I would like to have seen would be a worldclock input for synchronizing analog recordings to digital cameras, but the size of the bnc connector would have nixed that option in this handheld product.

Right now its brand new and running $600 – you can buy out of state to save tax but I haven’t seen any reputable sellers discounting it yet. Wait a month or two and it should drop. Being able to put a line level xlr recorder in my pocket was the selling point – everything else after that was pure gravy. Good job Marantz (from a former tascam fan!)
Rating: 5 / 5

I’ll be brief; First off I will state that I am very particular, and hard to please. I have been in the audio/music/broadcast business about 40 years

I have not used any of the other flash recorders. Prior to purchasing I did heavy research and the PMD661 fit my needs. This has the features I want, and the sound quality is amazing. I have used it with a Rode NT4 stereo mic, a Sennheiser shotgun mic, a Sennheiser broadcast headset, and direct from the console via spdf digital. All produced great recordings.

The internal mics will do in a pinch, but are not the best, and the preamp for the internal mic is noisy. The external mic preamps are clean and quiet. At first I though there was a lot of noise, but it turns out to be from the headphone amp. The actual files sound great.

Transferring tracks is a breeze

The design and build quality are fantastic

cons;

Headphone amp is VERY weak – seriously. I would pay for a mod.

Software included is for Windows only

Internal mics pick up a lot of handling noise.

No timecode sync

Cost – a bit high but then – well you get what you pay for. This is suitable for professional work.

My purchase through Amazon was quick and easy as usual.

Buy one. You will not be disappointed
Rating: 5 / 5

I’ve owned this unit for a few weeks and I must say that Marantz really hit one out of the park with this one. I had previously owned a PMD660 and it was a nice enough unit, but I could never understand its wild popularity. It had a cheap feel to it and the sound was mediocre. The 661, on the other hand, is a tank. Think of the 660 as the rough draft for this finished product. Just about everything is done right this time and the sound through the improved preamps is significantly cleaner. I’ve read some comments that it may be a little large, especially considering how compact much of the competition is nowadays, but I think the size is perfect. You can easily hold it in one hand and the display is big, bright and easy to read at a glance.

The only improvement I can think of offhand, possibly in a 2nd generation unit (are you listening Marantz?) would be a color display. As easy as this one is to read it would be even easier if record mode glowed with a red “rec” and pause with a green “pause.”

Highly recommended.
Rating: 5 / 5

Yes, the price on this baby is steep. You can get a pretty good Marantz HT receiver for this money.

But what you get for the price of two Edirol HDs is a leap in sound quality, build quality, and ease of use. Build quality may or may not matter in your situation. The way my stuff gets hit in the field, it’s important for me. Camera tripod mount is great for this unit–it sets it apart from the mics on mic stands and helps others to notice the piece of high-end gear on the stand and try to be careful around it.

Data dumps are a breeze in Mac and Windows. I’ve had no file misreads yet, anywhere.

Line-in XLR allows full low-noise field mastering in a multi-mic stereo setup.

hi-res lossless is the selling point for many at this price level. There is simply nothing else at this price point that can do this resolution.

And because of the XLR line ins, your hi-res lossless recordings will have an exceptionally low noise floor.

None of the mid-level digital recorders can do this, and this is why I ponied up.

It sounds so much better than its lower-priced competition that it belongs in this price category beyond them.

If you want Edirol quality sound, Marantz makes the 620 for you, a thoroughly competent unit in its price class.

But if you have significant audio to record and you are willing to spend an extra 300 bucks to get far better audio quality, this unit will make you happy.
Rating: 5 / 5

I use digital audio recorders for ethnographic fieldwork, usually in cities and urban settings. I’ve used the PMD660 in the past and I can say that the PMD661 is, without a doubt, a major improvement. It’s slightly smaller, weighs less, and the user interface is just better. Also, the upgrade to SD/SDHC is a major improvement over the old compact flash. The other reviews are much more thorough, so I won’t go into it here. Suffice to say that the PMD661 is great for ethnographers b/c of its versatility and potential to make high quality recordings.

One thing: you should probably plan on about three hours of battery time. Over five hours is pretty idealistic, and definitely not possible if you need phantom power.
Rating: 5 / 5

 

Leave a Comment

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free